3 minutos
TokyoA PhD, or doctorate, corresponds to the third cycle of official university studies and leads to the acquisition of skills and competences needed for high quality scientific research. It’s the highest post-graduate qualification that can be obtained and gives its holders the right to be referred to as “Doctor”. The Spanish Royal Academy defines “doctorate” as “full, complete knowledge of a subject”.
The posts in this blog express different opinions regarding the PhD in Architecture. Some affirm that its research dimension is purely instrumental, justifiable as preparation for writing the thesis but reflecting no real interest in furthering knowledge of a given subject. Others say a doctorate has no impact on an architect’s professional activity outside of teaching, unless the specialisation accredited by the qualification is being showcased on the international labour market. Still others question the rigour of scientific publications – a sine qua non prerequisite for defending a doctoral thesis – on the grounds that they’re often based on reviews by other doctors who aren’t necessarily experts in the fields studied by other researchers. In this respect, however, there are also people like Carlos Camara, for whom the important thing is the expertise in scientific methodology that a doctor can contribute to research in general.
In view of such differing opinions,, and having just finished my own six-year doctoral research programme at the ETSA (University School of Architecture) in Madrid, including a two-year pre-doctoral placement at a university in Japan, I would like to submit my own thoughts on the issue. They’re summed up in 3 main ideas:
Are you considering doing a PhD? Are you currently doing your research, or have you finished it already? Do you have a different point of view? Going back to the question in the title of this post: for me, doing a PhD is definitely worth it. And very much so.
